Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:04

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Do older men realize that younger women usually do not prefer them?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Popular rock band thrown off concert lineup after icon’s wife fights with band manager - NJ.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Bradford researchers solve mystery of disease and wool trade - BBC
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Dakota Johnson Uses Tissue to Cover Cleavage Amid Wardrobe Malfunction - Yahoo
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Civilization VII patch lets you turn off some controversial new features - Ars Technica
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Do you think Taylor Swift will pay a price in the marketplace for endorsing Democrats?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.